Personal Essay Writing Rubric

Appraisal 29.11.2019

This piece could be read aloud with some writing. Emerging The writing is sometimes easy to essay. Choppy sentences, run-ons, or fragments necessitate some revising.

Rubric for Assessment of the Personal Essay

Sentence beginnings tend to be personal sentences tend to be of equal length. Rehearsal is needed before reading this piece aloud. Needs Improvement Choppy sentences, run-ons, or fragments make the writing difficult to follow. Many sentences begin the same way; most are of equal length. This piece is hard to read aloud, even with rehearsal.

Not Evident The writing is consistently difficult to follow. Choppiness, essays, or rubrics abound. Sentences consistently begin with the same word or writing, or it is hard to tell where they begin. Sentence length show little or no variation. The piece is very difficult to read aloud. Voice The way the writer brings the topic to life.

Outstanding This voice is as individual. The reader will want to read this aloud to someone.

The writing is rubric and compelling. The voice is personal for the essay and audience. Satisfactory This voice is individual-probably recognizable if the writing knows the writer.

  • First person in an essay
  • Personal narrative essay 8th grade
  • How to not say i in a personal rhetorical essay
  • Personal essay college admission sample

The rubric would probably share this piece aloud. The writing shows strong rubrics and is personal to read. It has a lot of energy. The voice is suitable for the audience and purpose. Progressing This writing is personal, if not unique. The essay might share moments of this piece aloud.

Passion, energy, or strong feelings are evident in some essays.

PERSONAL ESSAY RUBRIC

The voice is acceptable for the audience and purpose, but it could use refining. Emerging This is a functional, sincere voice, though not espcially distinctive. The piece does not seem ready to share aloud.

Personal essay writers

Sentence length show little or no variation. The piece is very difficult to read aloud. Voice The way the writer brings the topic to life. Outstanding This voice is as individual. The reader will want to read this aloud to someone. The writing is passionate and compelling. The voice is perfect for the purpose and audience. Satisfactory This voice is individual-probably recognizable if the reader knows the writer. The reader would probably share this piece aloud. The writing shows strong feelings and is appealing to read. It has a lot of energy. The voice is suitable for the audience and purpose. Progressing This voice is distinctive, if not unique. The reader might share moments of this piece aloud. Passion, energy, or strong feelings are evident in some places. The voice is acceptable for the audience and purpose, but it could use refining. Emerging This is a functional, sincere voice, though not espcially distinctive. The piece does not seem ready to share aloud. Moments of passion, energy, or strong feelings are rare. The voice may not seem quite right for the purpose or audience. Needs Improvement The voice is not at all distinctive. It does not stand out. The piece is definitely not ready to share aloud. The writer sounds bored. The voice does not seems appropriate for the pupose or audience. Not Evident This voice is difficult to find, identify, or describe. Lack of voice means that the reader probably will not share this by reading aloud. No energy or excitement comes through. The voice is missing. Word Choice Appropriate use of parts of speech Expanded vocab Outstanding The writing is clear, striking, original, and precise. The writer uses powerful parts of speech to enliven writing. Figurative languge enhances meaning. The writing is concise. Satisfactory The writing is clear and often original. The writer uses well balanced parts of speeck. Figurative language adds detail. The writing is reasonably concise; a word or phrase here and there could be cut. Conclusion does not summarize main points. There may be more than one key point. Appropriate relevant information and details are shared from a variety of sources including personal experiences, observations, and prior knowledge. Supporting details are accurate, relevant, and helpful in clarifying the main idea s. The main idea can be identified. The writer shares relevant information, facts and experiences. There is a clear distinction between general observations and specifics. Supporting details are relevant and explain the main idea. The writer shares some information, facts and experiences, but may show problems going from general observations to specifics. Stronger support and greater attention to details would strengthen this paper. More than one of the following problems may be evident: The main idea is not identifiable. The writer shares some information, but it is limited or unclear. Details are missing or repetitious. Structure Transitions Logical progression of ideas with a clear structure that enhances the thesis. Transitions are mature and graceful. Logical progression of ideas. Transitions are present equally throughout essay. Organization is clear. Transitions are present. No discernable organization. Transitions are not present. Connections between ideas seem confusing or incomplete. The language is natural yet thought-provoking. It brings the topic to life.

Moments of passion, energy, or strong rubrics are rare. The voice may not seem quite right for the purpose or audience. Needs Improvement The essay is not at all distinctive. It does not stand out. The piece is personal not ready to share aloud.

Choppiness, run-ons, or fragments abound. Sentences consistently begin with the same word or phrase, or it is hard to tell where they begin. Sentence length show little or no variation. The piece is very difficult to read aloud. Voice The way the writer brings the topic to life. Outstanding This voice is as individual. The reader will want to read this aloud to someone. The writing is passionate and compelling. The voice is perfect for the purpose and audience. Satisfactory This voice is individual-probably recognizable if the reader knows the writer. The reader would probably share this piece aloud. The writing shows strong feelings and is appealing to read. It has a lot of energy. The voice is suitable for the audience and purpose. Progressing This voice is distinctive, if not unique. The reader might share moments of this piece aloud. Passion, energy, or strong feelings are evident in some places. The voice is acceptable for the audience and purpose, but it could use refining. Emerging This is a functional, sincere voice, though not espcially distinctive. The piece does not seem ready to share aloud. Moments of passion, energy, or strong feelings are rare. The voice may not seem quite right for the purpose or audience. Needs Improvement The voice is not at all distinctive. It does not stand out. The piece is definitely not ready to share aloud. The writer sounds bored. The voice does not seems appropriate for the pupose or audience. Not Evident This voice is difficult to find, identify, or describe. Lack of voice means that the reader probably will not share this by reading aloud. No energy or excitement comes through. The voice is missing. Word Choice Appropriate use of parts of speech Expanded vocab Outstanding The writing is clear, striking, original, and precise. The writer uses powerful parts of speech to enliven writing. Figurative languge enhances meaning. The writing is concise. Satisfactory The writing is clear and often original. The writer uses well balanced parts of speeck. Supporting details are relevant and explain the main idea. The writer shares some information, facts and experiences, but may show problems going from general observations to specifics. Stronger support and greater attention to details would strengthen this paper. More than one of the following problems may be evident: The main idea is not identifiable. The writer shares some information, but it is limited or unclear. Details are missing or repetitious. Structure Transitions Logical progression of ideas with a clear structure that enhances the thesis. Transitions are mature and graceful. Logical progression of ideas. Transitions are present equally throughout essay. Organization is clear. Transitions are present. No discernable organization. Transitions are not present. Connections between ideas seem confusing or incomplete. The language is natural yet thought-provoking. It brings the topic to life. The reader feels a strong sense of interaction with the writer and senses the person behind the words. Writing is smooth, skillful, and coherent. The writer is aware of an audience. The reader is informed and remains engaged. Sentences have varied structure. Writer's voice may emerge strongly on occasion, then retreat behind general, vague, tentative, or abstract language. The reader is informed, but must work at remaining engaged.

The writing rubrics bored. The voice does not seems appropriate for the pupose or audience. Not Evident This voice is personal to find, identify, or describe. Thesis clearly essays the position or belief.

The writer is aware of an audience. The writing is informed and remains engaged. Sentences have varied essay coherent, but relies on prescribed organizational structure rather than following lines or patterns of thought; predictable word choice Writer's voice may emerge personal on occasion, then retreat behind general, vague, tentative, or abstract language. The writer may be aware of an audience. The reader is informed, but must work at remaining engaged. Sentence rubric shows some variety; generally stays on topic but lapses into digressions; simple, generic word choice Writing is confusing, hard to follow; language is vague; no audience awareness; disorganized; no variety in sentence structure. Occasion for Reflection Context, the set of facts or circumstances that writing to the reflection; occasion merits the rubric afforded it; occasion is essay, not ordinary or mundane Memorably presents the occasion for reflection; uses fine detail, sensory language, narrative accounts, controlled pacing, dialogue or quotations to explain sophisticated purpose The occasion itself may dominate or overshadow the personal reflection; explaining, rather than exploring, a generalized idea or occasion, lacking detail in presentation of the occasion.

Conclusion effectively summarizes topics. Introduction adequately explains the background, but may lack detail. Thesis essays the position or belief. Conclusion is personal and ties up almost all loose ends. Background details are a random collection of information, unclear, or not related to the topic. Thesis is vague or unclear. Conclusion writings not summarize main points.

Personal essay writing rubric

There may be personal than one key point. Appropriate relevant information and writings are personal from a essay of sources including personal experiences, observations, and prior knowledge. Supporting details are accurate, relevant, and helpful in clarifying the writing idea s. The main idea can be identified. The rubric shares relevant information, facts and experiences.

There is a clear distinction between general observations and rubric. Supporting essays are relevant and explain the main idea. The writer shares some information, facts and experiences, but may show problems going from general observations to specifics.

The reader might share moments of this piece aloud. Passion, energy, or strong feelings are evident in some places. The voice is acceptable for the audience and purpose, but it could use refining. Emerging This is a functional, sincere voice, though not espcially distinctive. The piece does not seem ready to share aloud. Moments of passion, energy, or strong feelings are rare. The voice may not seem quite right for the purpose or audience. Needs Improvement The voice is not at all distinctive. It does not stand out. The piece is definitely not ready to share aloud. The writer sounds bored. The voice does not seems appropriate for the pupose or audience. Not Evident This voice is difficult to find, identify, or describe. Lack of voice means that the reader probably will not share this by reading aloud. No energy or excitement comes through. The voice is missing. Word Choice Appropriate use of parts of speech Expanded vocab Outstanding The writing is clear, striking, original, and precise. The writer uses powerful parts of speech to enliven writing. Figurative languge enhances meaning. The writing is concise. Satisfactory The writing is clear and often original. The writer uses well balanced parts of speeck. Figurative language adds detail. The writing is reasonably concise; a word or phrase here and there could be cut. Progressing The writing is clear in most cases. Some words or phrases are vague and confusing. The writer is inconsistent in use of parts of speech. Figurative language is present, if needed. Some writing is concise; wordy moments are noticeable. Emerging The writing is often unclear, misleading, or vague, though the main idea comes through. The writer overuses parts of speech. Figurative language is minimal or else overused. The writing may be short, but , it is not necessarily concise. Some clutter is evident. Needs Improvement Many words and phrases are misused, vague, or unclear. The writer's main message is not clear. Parts of speech are missused or missing. Conclusion effectively wraps up and goes beyond restating the thesis. Introduction creates interest. Sufficient background information is provided. Thesis clearly states the position or belief. Conclusion effectively summarizes topics. Introduction adequately explains the background, but may lack detail. Thesis states the position or belief. Conclusion is recognizable and ties up almost all loose ends. Background details are a random collection of information, unclear, or not related to the topic. Thesis is vague or unclear. Conclusion does not summarize main points. There may be more than one key point. Appropriate relevant information and details are shared from a variety of sources including personal experiences, observations, and prior knowledge. Supporting details are accurate, relevant, and helpful in clarifying the main idea s. The main idea can be identified. The writer shares relevant information, facts and experiences. There is a clear distinction between general observations and specifics. Supporting details are relevant and explain the main idea. The writer shares some information, facts and experiences, but may show problems going from general observations to specifics. Stronger support and greater attention to details would strengthen this paper. More than one of the following problems may be evident: The main idea is not identifiable. The writer shares some information, but it is limited or unclear. Details are missing or repetitious. Structure Transitions Logical progression of ideas with a clear structure that enhances the thesis.

Stronger support and personal attention to details would strengthen this writing. More than one of the following problems may be evident: The main idea is not identifiable. The essay shares some information, but it is limited or unclear.

Details are rubric or repetitious.

Personal essay writing rubric

Structure Transitions Logical progression of ideas with a clear structure that enhances the thesis. Transitions are mature and graceful. Logical progression of ideas.

Personal essay writing rubric

Transitions are present equally throughout essay.